![]() ![]() I assumed it was because it was going into a different server. I came to that conclusion because I could upload the same image on a different day, or different week, and it would display properly. So I thought images on certain servers behaved differently. You know a site like IS must have many servers. My final conclusion was that it must be something about the server. ![]() I never was able to figure out if it was something with the images. Not all images with transparent background showed black, but some did. Often a transparent background would be displayed as black. But if it's a problem with a website, and you don't have any control over the website, there probably not much you can do.įor example, I used to use ImageShack as a host for images that I needed to upload. If you have the option of using a different viewer that might work - you can only try it. In your search, did you come across the several to many messages explaining that some viewers and some websites just have this problem, and there's not much you can do about it. When you upload to a website, which browser are you using to view it? There are other ways to punch a negative space through an object - clipping and masking are the obvious ones - but Path > Difference is likely to be the best method for the result you're trying to achieve.Could you share the PNG with us, so we can test? Can you share the address of the website? Or a link to the image where it's uploaded? with a copy of your shape both before and after Stroke to Path has been applied). If not, can you explain in more detail, and attach an SVG file that shows the problem (e.g. I'm not sure what you mean by "all circles and squares are ungrouped", unless it's the second point above. Because Stroke to Path throws away the original object and creates a single complex path with the stroke colour as its fill, any fill that was present on the original path is lost.Once you've done Stroke to Path you've already got a new path that can be removed from the square path using Path > Difference. There are a couple of things that come out of this that affect what you're trying to do: This actually means that the centre of the drawing, as viewed by a human, is actually outside the path! In graphic terms everything between these boundaries is "inside" the new path, everything else is "outside". ![]() In this case one sub-path forms the outer boundary, and another sub-path forms the inner boundary. In the case of a circle, the new shape is a complex path - one consisting of multiple sub-paths. It also deletes the existing path, as it's exposed to the user as though you've converted the path into a new shape. When you use Stroke to Path you're asking Inkscape to make a completely new path based on the shape it traces over the existing path. The thickness of the stroke doesn't come into it at all, which is why you saw a big hole punched out in your first test. In this case one path that forms the boundary of a square, and another that forms the boundary of a circle. When you use Path > Difference the operation takes place with the paths themselves. But the stroke isn't the path itself, it's just another way of making the infinitely thin line visible to the human eye. When you display a stroke, Inkscape effectively traces a shape along the path to present the "line" you see on screen. When you fill a closed path in Inkscape it just colours in all the pixels up to the boundary. It's important to understand what a path really is in SVG terms: essentially it's an infinitely thin line that acts as a boundary - it's a mathematical construct rather than the shape you see on the screen. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |